Several law firms have stepped forward to offer their services to investors of Hut 8 who suffered losses on the Nasdaq due to allegations of short-selling. On January 19, the share prices of Bitcoin mining firm Hut 8 plummeted by 23%, dropping from $7.12 to $2.16, following the release of an unverified report by J Capital. The report claimed that insiders were planning to sell off their Hut 8 stock. However, Hut 8 reviewed the report and on January 24, dismissed all allegations of short-selling, stating that the report falsely accused their partner, USBTC, of a history of legal trouble in a merger deal worth $725 million. Following this, Jaime Leverton resigned as the CEO of Hut 8 and was replaced by Asher Genoot, who previously served as the president and a member of the company’s board of directors.
All the supporting law firms are urging investors who purchased Hut 8 stocks between November 9, 2023, and January 18, 2024, to join their efforts in seeking a settlement for the losses incurred during that time period. Shareholders of Hut 8 who suffered losses during this timeframe and wish to serve as lead plaintiffs are requested to contact the law firm of their choice by April 8, 2024.
J Capital released a report criticizing Hut 8 as a short-seller on January 18. According to Kuznicki Law, one of the law firms involved, Hut 8 and its executives violated federal securities laws by misrepresenting certain financial information, which ultimately had a negative impact on the share price.
While some lawsuits are focused on individual investors who experienced losses, others argue that all shareholders who purchased stocks during the specified time period are entitled to compensation. Furthermore, a contingency fee arrangement will ensure that participating shareholders are not responsible for court fees.
In other news, on March 6, Hut 8 announced the closure of its mining site in Drumheller, Alberta, Canada, citing power disruptions and rising energy costs. The newly appointed CEO, Genoot, explained that after conducting a thorough analysis, they concluded that the profitability of Drumheller had been significantly affected by various factors, including high energy costs and underlying voltage issues.
Related Posts
Add A Comment