• Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Blockchain
  • DeFi
  • Policies
  • Expert Interview
  • For Beginners
  • All Posts
Hot News

KiloEX Exchange Exploiter Returns $5.5 Million Days Following $7.5 Million Hack

04/18/2025

Crypto Rug Pulls Have Decreased in Frequency, Yet Their Impact Has Intensified: DappRadar

04/18/2025

Manta Founder Describes Attempted Zoom Hack by Lazarus Involving Authentic ‘Legit Faces’

04/18/2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
X (Twitter) Telegram
CoinomiCoinomi
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Blockchain
  • DeFi
  • Policies
  • Expert Interview
  • For Beginners
  • All Posts
CoinomiCoinomi
Home » As gambling surges, why does investing remain under constraints?
As gambling surges, why does investing remain under constraints?
As gambling surges, why does investing remain under constraints?
Policies

As gambling surges, why does investing remain under constraints?

05/30/20243 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The legalization of gambling in the United States is on the rise, with new casinos popping up in various locations outside of Las Vegas. Even professional sports leagues that were once against sports betting are now embracing it. Despite its questionable social benefits, gambling is open to the general public, subject to certain age restrictions. However, startup investing, as well as investing in venture capital funds or collectible art, is not accessible to all.

These activities are limited to what is known as “accredited investors.” The American government seems to prefer people risking their money on casino games, where the odds are stacked against them, rather than investing in startups that have the potential to succeed. Accredited investor laws restrict certain types of investing to so-called “sophisticated investors.” However, sophistication is not measured by knowledge or experience, as there is no test to determine it. Instead, wealth is the determining factor. According to the government, being sophisticated means having an annual income of at least $200,000 or a net worth exceeding $1 million.

Interestingly, how much someone knows about the investment is irrelevant. This means that a 60-year-old who inherited a family construction business can freely invest in AI startups, while a 24-year-old with a degree in machine learning cannot. These laws, although meant to protect ordinary people from risky investments, are enforced by the same government that encourages them to play the lottery, which has terrible odds and is directly marketed to the poor. Economists refer to this as a “regressive tax.”

These rules contribute to wealth inequality, as asset prices have consistently outperformed wages over time. Those who derive their wealth from investments have fared better than those who solely rely on earned income. While many types of investments have performed well, those reserved for the already wealthy have seen the most significant gains.

Cryptocurrency has been an exception to this trend. Bitcoin and Ethereum, in particular, have been both accessible to the public and highly profitable investments. However, the U.S. government has intervened and declared the Ethereum ICO illegal due to the participation of ordinary people. If it were up to the government, the enormous returns would have gone to those who needed it the least.

As a result of these regulations, most crypto projects now raise funds from venture capital funds or angel investors, who are also accredited. Additionally, most crypto projects limit the eligibility of recipients for their airdrops. The government claims that these measures are in place to protect people, but at the same time, it allows complicated same-day parlays to be advertised to countless individuals before sports matches. While over half of all Americans have reportedly gambled in the past year, fewer than 20% qualify as accredited investors.

Cryptocurrency often serves as a reflection of our society, forcing us to critically examine how things currently operate and presenting an alternative perspective. It highlights the shortcomings of our legal and regulatory system, which may not be the most flattering view.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Binance Assists Countries in Managing Bitcoin Reserves and Developing Crypto Policies, According to CEO

04/17/2025

XRP: Reasons for Its Outperformance Compared to Altcoins and Future Outlook

04/17/2025

Bitcoin US vs. Offshore Exchange Rate Indicates Bullish Signal, Suggesting Potential BTC Price Peaks in 2025

04/16/2025

Court Grants 60-Day Stay in SEC vs. Ripple Appeals Case

04/16/2025
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

KiloEX Exchange Exploiter Returns $5.5 Million Days Following $7.5 Million Hack

04/18/2025

Crypto Rug Pulls Have Decreased in Frequency, Yet Their Impact Has Intensified: DappRadar

04/18/2025

Manta Founder Describes Attempted Zoom Hack by Lazarus Involving Authentic ‘Legit Faces’

04/18/2025

Coinomi - Where insights meet innovation. Discover the world of blockchain and cryptocurrency with a focus on insightful narratives and groundbreaking trends.

X (Twitter) Telegram
Hot Insights

KiloEX Exchange Exploiter Returns $5.5 Million Days Following $7.5 Million Hack

04/18/2025

Crypto Rug Pulls Have Decreased in Frequency, Yet Their Impact Has Intensified: DappRadar

04/18/2025

Manta Founder Describes Attempted Zoom Hack by Lazarus Involving Authentic ‘Legit Faces’

04/18/2025
X (Twitter) Telegram
  • Home
  • News
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Blockchain
  • DeFi
  • Policies
  • Expert Interview
  • For Beginners
Copyright © 2025 Coinomi. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.